Comments on: The US-Russia-Ukraine Triangle http://blog.psaonline.org/2009/10/19/the-us-russia-ukraine-triangle/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:45:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Tetyana Vysotska http://blog.psaonline.org/2009/10/19/the-us-russia-ukraine-triangle/comment-page-1/#comment-2122542 Tetyana Vysotska Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:14:37 +0000 http://blog.psaonline.org/?p=2562#comment-2122542 Nord Stream will surely not "cut Ukraine from the gas trade" for one simple reason that the North export route will have different sources of gas (Stockman gas field) and target countries (UK, Germany, Netherlands, Denmark and other) than Ukrainian gas pipeline system has. Nord Stream will surely not “cut Ukraine from the gas trade” for one simple reason that the North export route will have different sources of gas (Stockman gas field) and target countries (UK, Germany, Netherlands, Denmark and other) than Ukrainian gas pipeline system has.

]]> By: cherkasy5 http://blog.psaonline.org/2009/10/19/the-us-russia-ukraine-triangle/comment-page-1/#comment-2121234 cherkasy5 Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:05:31 +0000 http://blog.psaonline.org/?p=2562#comment-2121234 This article reflects a naive neo-conservative view that NATO would ever step up to the plate to become involved in a Russian-Ukrainian conflict over Crimea. Then there is the problem of some 70 percent of Ukrainians opposing joining NATO. Neocons in the US, as well as the small minority of Ukrainians who support NATO membership, ought to refocus their efforts more effective forms of US-Ukraine cooperation. This article reflects a naive neo-conservative view that NATO would ever step up to the plate to become involved in a Russian-Ukrainian conflict over Crimea. Then there is the problem of some 70 percent of Ukrainians opposing joining NATO.

Neocons in the US, as well as the small minority of Ukrainians who support NATO membership, ought to refocus their efforts more effective forms of US-Ukraine cooperation.

]]>