<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DPRK-ja-vu, all over again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.psaonline.org/2008/10/03/dprk-ja-vu-all-over-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2008/10/03/dprk-ja-vu-all-over-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Rojansky</title>
		<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2008/10/03/dprk-ja-vu-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1285891</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Rojansky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.psaonline.org/?p=617#comment-1285891</guid>
		<description>Blundering negotiations with Pyongyang twice hasn&#039;t cost us much other than time, and a bit of face, but the next time is likely to be our last.  North Korea is the only state that has both nuclear weapons and a thinly veiled but very plausible policy of passing those weapons to terrorist groups.  That puts the US in the impossible position of having to negotiate a denuclearization deal while maintaining a credible threat of nuclear retaliation against North Korea should a terrorist nuclear attack be traced to North Korean materials.  As Mike rightly points out, the nukes themselves are the North Koreans&#039; only bargaining chips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blundering negotiations with Pyongyang twice hasn&#8217;t cost us much other than time, and a bit of face, but the next time is likely to be our last.  North Korea is the only state that has both nuclear weapons and a thinly veiled but very plausible policy of passing those weapons to terrorist groups.  That puts the US in the impossible position of having to negotiate a denuclearization deal while maintaining a credible threat of nuclear retaliation against North Korea should a terrorist nuclear attack be traced to North Korean materials.  As Mike rightly points out, the nukes themselves are the North Koreans&#8217; only bargaining chips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

