Comments on: Welcome to Embassy Tehran (more or less)

By: Across the Aisle » Moral Hazard and the Olive Branch

Across the Aisle » Moral Hazard and the Olive Branch — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:47:33 +0000

[...] headaches on the Security Council. I’ve personally blogged about the need to reach out to Iran, Syria and Cuba, and PSA recently put out a statement about renewing the U.S.-Russia [...]

By: Across the Aisle » Want Middle East peace? Next stop: Damascus

Across the Aisle » Want Middle East peace? Next stop: Damascus — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:04:30 +0000

[...] one of them. Iran has no interest in improving the security situation for Israel. I have pushed for the U.S. to talk directly to Iran, but for different reasons. Quite simply, we need to talk to Iran to contain Iran, both by [...]

By: Michael Landweber

Michael Landweber — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:18:45 +0000

Looks like this won’t happen anytime soon. The Bush Administration decided that taking this step would interfere in the Presidential campaign.

However, based on this article , it sounds like the Administration can’t decide whether the move would help Obama or McCain.

Of course, there’s still plenty of time after the election for the Bush Administration to open a interests-section. What’s the excuse going to be then?

By: BiBiJon

BiBiJon — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:59:59 +0000

Before “contact, dialogue and, ultimately, diplomacy” a fundamental change in attitudes must take place. Engaging Russia without listening to her concerns has not produced compromise and partnership.

Al Gore may have invented the Internet, but even he will be the first to deny he owns it. USA has been the enabler of globalization, at immense cost and sacrifice. However, a successful posture cannot be as if USA therefore owns the world.

For a reality check on Iran, please see
http://www.bibijon.org/iranimage/