Video of ‘A Bipartisan Foreign Policy for January 2009′

by Jeffrey Asjes | June 24th, 2008 | |Subscribe

This morning, we got Ambassador Tom Pickering, Bud Mcfarlan, and Rick Barton in a room together to see what they had to say about the kinds of foreign policy our next president could enact with support from both sides of the aisle.

Part 1:


Pickering kicked off the discussion with a tidy summary of some of the most major foreign policy problems that the new president will have to face, placing emphasis on the middle east for the short term, but with an eye to future possibilities for conflict and cooperation with China, India and Russia.

Part 2:

From there the discussion centered on the ways in which the president could spearhead bipartisan cooperation on foreign policy. There seemed to be wide agreement on the idea that some form of consultation body or commission would allow for more informed foreign policies, and naturally promote greater bipartisanship on some of these tough issues.

Part 3:

Eventually the discussion moved on to the future of our Iraq policy. Naturally, there was disagreement on that issue, particularly on the timetable of an American withdrawal, but each of the speakers, especially Tom Pickering, noted that the major goals of both parties are the same. Though there may be widespread disagreement on when, and under what circumstances we ought to withdraw, the problem is not an insurmountable one.

After Iraq, of course, came the current worsening energy situation. Here, there was very little disagreement indeed. The main point was essentially that, regardless of method, our next president will have to work hard on weaning the United States off of gasoline.

Overall, the discussion was very interesting, and showed clearly both where the two parties agree and disagree, and how our next president might go about finding a foreign policy consensus.

Related posts:

  1. Politico covers the Congressional Fellowship Program
  2. Welcome to PSA Congressional Fellows
  3. Possible bipartisan principles on Afghanistan?
  4. The Idiot’s Guide to Bipartisanship for Dummies
  5. Partisan Fatigue

3 Comments »

  1. A Bipartisan Foreign Policy for January ‘09 « Common Ground Blog wrote,

    [...] take a look at video of the conference here at PSA’s blog, Across the Aisle. The full discussion shines light on the places the parties differ, but also more importantly, the [...]

    Pingback on June 24, 2008 @ 11:46 am

  2. Jeffrey Asjes wrote,

    Dan Bliss wrote a very good summary of the discussion on his new blog, ‘Search For Common Ground’:

    “Following my June 19 post on bipartisanship as “foreign policy’s best hope,” I attended a discussion hosted by not-for-profit Partnership for a Secure America about ways the next President can work with both sides of the aisle on foreign policy and national security issues. Participants were Amb. Thomas Pickering, who has served under several Republican and Democratic Presidents; Bud McFarlane, former National Security Adviser to President Reagan; and Rick Barton, Senior Adviser, International Security Program at CSIS.

    PSA’s Executive Director, Matt Rojansky, set the tone of the discussion in his opening: “The debate can be better, and therefore America as a country can do better.” What struck me immediately was the panelists’ earnest effort to engage in a dialogue. By no means did they hide from or apologize for their political leanings. But they listened to one another, conceded points, and tried, not entirely successfully, to find mutually acceptable solutions.”

    Comment on June 25, 2008 @ 6:43 am

  3. U.S. Diplomacy » Blog Archive » Up for Discussion: The Foreign Policy of the Future wrote,

    [...] enact with support from both sides of the aisle. To watch all of the sections of the event, click here. Ambassador Pickering’s remarks, in which he enumerated the many foreign policy problems the next [...]

    Pingback on June 29, 2008 @ 12:11 pm

Leave a comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI