Gas tax and alternative energy investment…
Here’s an idea.
Although the high price of oil is creating a much more attractive market for investment in the development of alternative energy sources and energy conservation, our historical experience has shown that this increase in investment will likely decrease if the price of oil goes down. As a result, current investment levels in alternative energy are likely less than they would be if there was more certainty in the market that oil prices would not dip below an established minimum price.
While the costs of America’s over-dependence on oil are well known — supporting dictatorships, indirectly funding terrorism, harming US economy and global environment, etc. – the political costs of promoting a gas tax provide additional market certainty that oil prices will not dip so low as alternative energy sources begin to emerge so as to undermine the growth of alternative energies (as happened in the 1980s) have thus far proven insurmountable.
One way of creating this level of market certainty and therefore of further promoting investment in alternative energy sources and efficiency would be for the United States government to pass a gas tax at a level per gallon to be determined, that would only go into effect if oil prices fell below a certain value per barrel. All tax increases gained from this tax method would be offset by decreases in the payroll tax (a more progressive tax outcome).
If, for example, a gas tax were passed that would not go into effect until the price of oil per barrel dropped below sixty dollars a barrel (assuming that as the agreed minimum cost), no tax would be imposed under current conditions. If prices were to below this level, the tax would kick in and be updated quarterly to increase the price of oil per gallon to the equivalent of sixty dollars per barrel. Payroll taxes would be reduced by a fractional percentage to make sure that the overall cost to American consumers would be zero, although the wealthiest Americans would end up paying slightly more because many people in this group do not pay significant amounts of payroll tax relative to their incomes. Investors would know for certain that oil prices would never drop below $60 a barrel and could therefore plan, and act, accordingly.
Passing such a law would give a strong push to investors to more strongly promote the development of alternative energy sources and would make clear that the American government is serious about reducing our reliance on oil and imported oil. Taking this step would also itself have the potential to reduce oil prices.
What do readers think?
No related posts.






Procedure of loading batteries of an electrical vehicle by Aeolic system
The recharges of batteries, which supplies energy to the electric motor of a vehicle, will be carried out through an Aeolic System composed by the following elements:
-rotor
-generator,
-controller with load
-rectifier
The vehicle, being left over, will always have some air amount whose speed will be directly propertional to the same speed of the vehicle.
The air will enter in the autobody by the embrasures placed in the frontal part of the vehicle, and it will canalized towards the rotores.
The rotores could be one or more and they will be placed inside the auto body in a way not to hinder the advance of the vehicle creating friction.
The Permanent Magnet Generator (PMG) concurs of extracting the maximum
power by the rotor.
The controller with loads serves to prevent the damaging of the batteries.
The generated current will be “alternating current trifase” (AC) and will be converted from the rectifier in “direct current” (DC).
The generator, the controllers electronics, the rectifier and the batteries will be placed into the vehicle.
The direct current, finally, will be canalized, by a power cable , towards the batteries and it will recharge to them.
It will be also possible to load the batteries when the vehicle is stopped.
This is possible because the wind, investing the car from several points, will be put towards a rotor that will create described energy.
Purposes of the plan and advantages:
* to produce energy to cost 0 and 0 emissions, bringing a remarkable
economic, ecological and social advantage.
* the energy produced in march feeds the same march of the vehicle and there is no need to stop for the refueling.
* development of an innovative system based on rotators and generators placed into the autobody.
We are looking for partnership
cav. Salvatore Forzisi
via bezzecca 2
40139 Bologna
tel.(+39) 051 6233600
mobile(+39) 3465048310
http://energy1953.blogspot.com/
Comment on December 13, 2007 @ 1:05 pm