<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why would Iran talk to us?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/12/12/why-would-iran-talk-to-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/12/12/why-would-iran-talk-to-us/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: drugged sex rape</title>
		<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/12/12/why-would-iran-talk-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2512437</link>
		<dc:creator>drugged sex rape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/12/12/why-would-iran-talk-to-us/#comment-2512437</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ebony anal rape...&lt;/strong&gt;

extreme porn rape videos...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ebony anal rape&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>extreme porn rape videos&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Across the Aisle &#187; More Thoughts on the ISG Report</title>
		<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/12/12/why-would-iran-talk-to-us/comment-page-1/#comment-15380</link>
		<dc:creator>Across the Aisle &#187; More Thoughts on the ISG Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/12/12/why-would-iran-talk-to-us/#comment-15380</guid>
		<description>[...] Ben Rhodes and David Isenberg have matched wits on the ISG Report (here, here, and here), and Brian Vogt has offered some great observations as well. This debate might seem tiresome, but there are over 140,000 American servicemen and women in Iraq, plus tens of thousands more serving in other capacities (including foreign service officers and contractors). We are spending $8 billion per month, and the costs in lives lost and disrupted cannot be measured. Iraq is the defining foreign policy challenge of our time. It hangs over every other policy that we might wish to see enacted or changed. We cannot escape this debate. It cries out for bipartisanship, the very principle on which PSA is founded, and it seems appropriate that we would engage the debate right here, even at the risk of overdoing it a bit. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ben Rhodes and David Isenberg have matched wits on the ISG Report (here, here, and here), and Brian Vogt has offered some great observations as well. This debate might seem tiresome, but there are over 140,000 American servicemen and women in Iraq, plus tens of thousands more serving in other capacities (including foreign service officers and contractors). We are spending $8 billion per month, and the costs in lives lost and disrupted cannot be measured. Iraq is the defining foreign policy challenge of our time. It hangs over every other policy that we might wish to see enacted or changed. We cannot escape this debate. It cries out for bipartisanship, the very principle on which PSA is founded, and it seems appropriate that we would engage the debate right here, even at the risk of overdoing it a bit. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

