Africa and Our Attention

by Benjamin Rhodes | October 7th, 2006 | |Subscribe

George Packer has a pitch-perfect indictment of the latest round of inaction in Darfur, as a predictable spike in violence is/will be accompanied by a predictable round of condemnations, meetings, and failure to take effective action. His basic point: Africa is where everybody – meaning the U.S., Europe, the U.N., the Islamic world – has their gap between rhetoric and action exposed. We’re summoning greater and more timely outrage than we did with Rwanda, and still it makes little difference.

Africa and its tragedies – Darfur, Uganda, Congo, and on and on – simply cannot get the attention of western governments or the broad majorities of their public who would compel action. It does benefit from the attention of well-meaning celebrities, crusading jouranlists, and student activists, but there is a touch of condescension in this – that there is a status quo emerging where Africa is the domain of an international celebrity culture, and not institutions that could take more effective action (just look at the Clinton Global Initiative, where Bill Clinton is leading laudable efforts to solve problems in Africa after he has left the presidency).

Perhaps Packer’s most chilling statement is this: “But since when does the world listen to Africans? Unless Ivorians and Congolese start blowing themselves up in front of Western embassies and shops, it seems, their grievances won’t be taken seriously.” The implications of that statement are chilling in ways that the mind does not want to tackle.

Related posts:

  1. Zimbabwe’s Dirty Diamond Revenue: Approving Zimbabwe’s diamonds under the Kimberley Process will hinder political change

No Comments »

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI