<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bipartisan Energy Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/09/06/bipartisan-energy-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/09/06/bipartisan-energy-security/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: teamviewer build 90</title>
		<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/09/06/bipartisan-energy-security/comment-page-1/#comment-2436529</link>
		<dc:creator>teamviewer build 90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 02:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/09/06/bipartisan-energy-security/#comment-2436529</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;teamviewer build 90 crack...&lt;/strong&gt;

teamviewer build 90 serial...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>teamviewer build 90 crack&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>teamviewer build 90 serial&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flgkhdyqop</title>
		<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/09/06/bipartisan-energy-security/comment-page-1/#comment-135082</link>
		<dc:creator>flgkhdyqop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/09/06/bipartisan-energy-security/#comment-135082</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://uuapjtt.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;qzsbhnmb&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://uuapjtt.com" rel="nofollow">qzsbhnmb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delilah Anantha</title>
		<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/09/06/bipartisan-energy-security/comment-page-1/#comment-79140</link>
		<dc:creator>Delilah Anantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 15:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/09/06/bipartisan-energy-security/#comment-79140</guid>
		<description>Ne v dengah ne v muzejnoj pyl. Delilah Anantha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ne v dengah ne v muzejnoj pyl. Delilah Anantha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gawain Bernadine</title>
		<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/09/06/bipartisan-energy-security/comment-page-1/#comment-72053</link>
		<dc:creator>Gawain Bernadine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/09/06/bipartisan-energy-security/#comment-72053</guid>
		<description>Vse promolchat nikto ne skazhe. Gawain Bernadine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vse promolchat nikto ne skazhe. Gawain Bernadine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheapinternationalflights</title>
		<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/09/06/bipartisan-energy-security/comment-page-1/#comment-32299</link>
		<dc:creator>cheapinternationalflights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/09/06/bipartisan-energy-security/#comment-32299</guid>
		<description>cheaptrickiwantyoutowantme</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cheaptrickiwantyoutowantme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Across the Aisle &#187; A Gas Tax Refund for Energy Security</title>
		<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/09/06/bipartisan-energy-security/comment-page-1/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>Across the Aisle &#187; A Gas Tax Refund for Energy Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/09/06/bipartisan-energy-security/#comment-804</guid>
		<description>[...] In a post yesterday, Jamie Metzl proposed several useful ideas for promoting energy security.  Today I&#8217;d like to present an alternative idea that I think can and should gain bipartisan support - a gas tax refund.  Many others have proposed this idea, but I&#8217;ve been surprised that it has gained so little attention by our lawmakers.  The basic idea goes something like this.  Right now our country is overreliant on oil.  I say overreliant because our consumption of oil provides revenue to regimes that wish us harm and it forces our military to be involved in quite unstable areas.  Burning oil also releases greenhouse gasses that lead to environmental degradation and global warming.  Most of the oil in the US is consumed in the form of vehice fuel.  So, it makes sense that we should figure out ways to decrease our consumption of oil based fuels.  There are plenty of alternatives fuels and technology solutions out there - corn based ethanol, cellulosic ethanol, hybrid vehicles, lightweight materials, etc.  The problem is that these alternatives are relatively expensive compared to oil based fuel or have other downsides which makes them less attractive than cheap gasoline.  Granted, the price of gasoline has risen recently, which has started to encourage the adoption of these alternatives.  However, even these higher prices still fail to reflect the overall cost of our fuel consumption.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a post yesterday, Jamie Metzl proposed several useful ideas for promoting energy security.  Today I&#8217;d like to present an alternative idea that I think can and should gain bipartisan support &#8211; a gas tax refund.  Many others have proposed this idea, but I&#8217;ve been surprised that it has gained so little attention by our lawmakers.  The basic idea goes something like this.  Right now our country is overreliant on oil.  I say overreliant because our consumption of oil provides revenue to regimes that wish us harm and it forces our military to be involved in quite unstable areas.  Burning oil also releases greenhouse gasses that lead to environmental degradation and global warming.  Most of the oil in the US is consumed in the form of vehice fuel.  So, it makes sense that we should figure out ways to decrease our consumption of oil based fuels.  There are plenty of alternatives fuels and technology solutions out there &#8211; corn based ethanol, cellulosic ethanol, hybrid vehicles, lightweight materials, etc.  The problem is that these alternatives are relatively expensive compared to oil based fuel or have other downsides which makes them less attractive than cheap gasoline.  Granted, the price of gasoline has risen recently, which has started to encourage the adoption of these alternatives.  However, even these higher prices still fail to reflect the overall cost of our fuel consumption.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

