<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take My Intelligence Committee, PLEASE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/08/30/take-my-intelligence-committee-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/08/30/take-my-intelligence-committee-please/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:29:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Roeber</title>
		<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/08/30/take-my-intelligence-committee-please/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Roeber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/08/30/take-my-intelligence-committee-please/#comment-785</guid>
		<description>Gary Sick says &quot;it deserves to be recognised for what it is.&quot;  But will it be?  The failures in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq were not solely due to overbearing ideologues, brushing facts aside in the headlong rush to a foregone conclusion.  They were also those of journalists too supine and timid - and lazy - to examine the case being puffed by the Administration.  (This abject failure still baffles me.  American journalism has a great tradition of hard work and rigour.  What happened to it?)  You have made a good case, David, for treating the Hoekstra report with reservation, even for altogether dismissing it.  But you are writing for a small and self-selected audience.  It is up to journalists writing and broadcasting in mainstream media to persuade the American public that they are being conned again.  Will it happen?  I hope, I hope... but somehow I doubt it.  

Joe Roeber</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary Sick says &#8220;it deserves to be recognised for what it is.&#8221;  But will it be?  The failures in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq were not solely due to overbearing ideologues, brushing facts aside in the headlong rush to a foregone conclusion.  They were also those of journalists too supine and timid &#8211; and lazy &#8211; to examine the case being puffed by the Administration.  (This abject failure still baffles me.  American journalism has a great tradition of hard work and rigour.  What happened to it?)  You have made a good case, David, for treating the Hoekstra report with reservation, even for altogether dismissing it.  But you are writing for a small and self-selected audience.  It is up to journalists writing and broadcasting in mainstream media to persuade the American public that they are being conned again.  Will it happen?  I hope, I hope&#8230; but somehow I doubt it.  </p>
<p>Joe Roeber</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
