<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Do We Mean by UN &#8220;Reform&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/06/19/what-do-we-mean-by-un-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/06/19/what-do-we-mean-by-un-reform/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:16:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Across the Aisle &#187; Supporting Military Interventions to Protect Human Rights</title>
		<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/06/19/what-do-we-mean-by-un-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-20479</link>
		<dc:creator>Across the Aisle &#187; Supporting Military Interventions to Protect Human Rights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/06/19/what-do-we-mean-by-un-reform/#comment-20479</guid>
		<description>[...] In his most recent post Christopher Preble expresses concern about the advancement of the “responsibility to protect” norm, which grants the international community the right to intervene militarily when massive human rights violations are being perpetrated on a population whose government is responsible for those violations or is unable to stop them.  In my view, the benefits to the United States and the world of promoting the norm outweigh the risks.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In his most recent post Christopher Preble expresses concern about the advancement of the “responsibility to protect” norm, which grants the international community the right to intervene militarily when massive human rights violations are being perpetrated on a population whose government is responsible for those violations or is unable to stop them.  In my view, the benefits to the United States and the world of promoting the norm outweigh the risks.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Across the Aisle &#187; R2P and Interventions Today</title>
		<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/06/19/what-do-we-mean-by-un-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Across the Aisle &#187; R2P and Interventions Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 05:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/06/19/what-do-we-mean-by-un-reform/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>[...] I’d like to go back to the lively discussion here about the Responsibility to Protect, and the ideas launched by Christopher Preble and Jordan Tama as a spin-off from the debate over UN reform, genocide and preventive intervention.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I’d like to go back to the lively discussion here about the Responsibility to Protect, and the ideas launched by Christopher Preble and Jordan Tama as a spin-off from the debate over UN reform, genocide and preventive intervention.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
