<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unilateralism, For Real This Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/05/02/unilateralism-for-real-this-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/05/02/unilateralism-for-real-this-time/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Vogt</title>
		<link>http://blog.psaonline.org/2006/05/02/unilateralism-for-real-this-time/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vogt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 20:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.psaonline.org/?p=22#comment-6</guid>
		<description>You write an interesting post.  I guess the reason that we haven&#039;t been hearing much about multilateralism vis a vis an intervention in Iran is that we are still in the diplomacy stage.  Though, with the saber rattling going on, I question whether or not we are following the correct diplomatic tact at this stage.  I would find it hard to believe that even if Blair remains that he would be such a stalwart ally supporting Bush in Iran.  I hope/believe that he has learned his lesson from Iraq.  
 
One of the things that you mention was the criticisms of Bush by many who said that he didn&#039;t build a coalition.  For me this is a criticism that works for those who both didn&#039;t think that the war was right in the first place and also those who at the time felt that the war was right but that it wasn&#039;t handled in the correct manner.  I count myself in the first group.  I feel, however, that I can justify the lack of a coalition criticism, with the understanding that the ability to build a coalition should influence our decision whether or not to take military action.  If we can&#039;t build the coalition, then perhaps we should seriously reexamine our decision to go in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You write an interesting post.  I guess the reason that we haven&#8217;t been hearing much about multilateralism vis a vis an intervention in Iran is that we are still in the diplomacy stage.  Though, with the saber rattling going on, I question whether or not we are following the correct diplomatic tact at this stage.  I would find it hard to believe that even if Blair remains that he would be such a stalwart ally supporting Bush in Iran.  I hope/believe that he has learned his lesson from Iraq.  </p>
<p>One of the things that you mention was the criticisms of Bush by many who said that he didn&#8217;t build a coalition.  For me this is a criticism that works for those who both didn&#8217;t think that the war was right in the first place and also those who at the time felt that the war was right but that it wasn&#8217;t handled in the correct manner.  I count myself in the first group.  I feel, however, that I can justify the lack of a coalition criticism, with the understanding that the ability to build a coalition should influence our decision whether or not to take military action.  If we can&#8217;t build the coalition, then perhaps we should seriously reexamine our decision to go in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

